Jeff Goodell writes in Rolling Stone that
Miami is a doomed city. He writes about an imagined Hurricane that hits the city in 2030 and an ultimate demise of the city that leaves it as an unusual tourist destination. "And still, the waters kept rising, nearly a foot each decade. By the
latter end of the 21st century, Miami became something else entirely: a
popular snorkeling spot where people could swim with sharks and sea
turtles and explore the wreckage of a great American city." after the future scenarios, he analyzes the overall situation making it clear how many different factors contribute to the problem in Miami: rising sea level, more intense storms, high water table, nuclear reactors on the coast (with more proposed), and startlingly flat terrain (half of the land, he reports, surrounding Miami is less than 5 feet above sea level). With only modest inundation, Miami starts getting cut off from the rest of Florida. And, writes Goodell, those reactors get isolated from the mainland with only three feet of sea level rise:
"I went out there anyway. I was denied access to the inner workings,
but I got a very nice view of two aging 40-year-old reactors perched on
the edge of a rising sea with millions of people living within a few
miles of the plant. It was as clear a picture of the insanity of modern
life as I've ever seen."
View Larger Map
- 2° Celsius
- 565 Gigatons
- 2,795 Gigatons
This isn't exactly news. The NY Times
mapped out scenarios for a variety of cities last year and Miami instantly stood out. But together these two Rolling Stone pieces get a strong Places and Spaces recommendation. And
we recommend readers visit the beaches around Miami and the Everglades now, while they can.
View Larger Map