Does quick literal production help us create? Or are we better off using our imagination? Is this somehow different than larger models?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Comments and news about Environmental Planning and Design. Intended for all audiences including students and alumni of the Rutgers major of Environmental Planning and Design.
1 comment:
Good questions. I've been thinking about the same issues. Plastic's 'materialness' is lacking in many qualities; it holds little beauty for me currently. Thus constructing with it, particularly by spraying it, also has little beauty. But, as you suggest, 3-d printing might be a quick way to comprehend/test our design forms in true physical 3-d, rather than virtually on a 2-d screen, or painstakingly and awkwardly through stacking chipboard. So, as a fast, easy representation, yes, 3-d plastic printing is a good method for exploration, but as a final end-product, it would likely have little beauty.
I would like to design a ‘sandpit’ cnc printer/router that moves sand around a box and sprays adhesives to set the form as it goes. It would route out the hard-edged forms to make clean lines. This process would be both additive and subtractive.
Post a Comment