A judge threw out the case today apparently preventing the case reaching a full-blown trial. The Real-Time News at NJ.com reports:
But the judge said the right question is whether the law has a rational basis, "not whether every property that was excluded or included was property placed." As a whole, the Highlands Act "has a legitimate purpose and rational means of achieving that purpose," he said.Tomorrow's papers may have a few more details on the implications, but it certainly won't be the end of contention surrounding the Highlands of NJ.
(The photo was taken by former RU student Jenna Paulowski)
No comments:
Post a Comment