- A Frank, 2009, "Why is cartographic generalization so hard?"
- M. Monmonier. "Elements of the Map" from How to Lie With Maps.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Comments and news about Environmental Planning and Design. Intended for all audiences including students and alumni of the Rutgers major of Environmental Planning and Design.
Just the parts you want
You can isolate topics including Landscape Architecture, Environmental Geomatics, Environmental Planning, and Landscape Industry.
Local Resources
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(296)
-
▼
February
(50)
- RU Biking?
- Happy Leap Day
- Gasland: Film Screening and Panel Discussion
- Stantec internship
- Interesting participatory techniques
- NPS Internships
- Film and panel
- How important are soils in National Parks?
- Internship at Montclair State
- Benton MacKaye quote
- Energy Internships
- Ryan Perkl's ecological design tools
- For those of you interested in building your profe...
- Spring 2012 Environmental Geomatics Lecture
- Food + Land = Cool job
- Free GIS
- International border question
- Urban wetlands park
- Lecture: The Death and Life of Great American Land...
- A Sunday walk in HMF
- ERI for Englewood
- Changing the way you see old places
- Discussion of Readings 3
- Internship in Philly
- How much damage could one invasive species do?
- A planning board meeting that sounds exciting
- Playing around with colors
- Planning board meeting cheat sheet
- Why does Congress hate bikes and buses?
- Bimal Mendis and Joyce Hsiang on Territorial Pract...
- Jobs in PA
- Upcoming meetings
- Resource Assistance for Rural Environments (RARE)
- Cell phones around the world
- McHarg on the despoilers
- Gerrymandering
- Protected advertising
- Details on projections
- Stanley White quote
- Ari Novy Dissertation Defense Seminar
- Discussion of Readings 2
- Planning column by Barry Chalofsky
- Planning board meeting excitement
- Rutgers Alum in the news
- The Regional Student Forum
- Roberto Rovira's Azimuth Studio
- The Barrett Foundation Prize
- A crisp looking Yosemite
- Readings
- Spatial autocorrelation game
-
▼
February
(50)
Popular Posts
-
When the kids try to dig a hole straight down through the Earth, where are they headed? Strange Maps has posted a great map of all of the l...
-
Can you get a cheap ticket to Seattle? It would be a great place to learn, but what would you see? Pike Place. Gas Works Park. Bloedel R... -
For Research Methods you might want to peek ahead at this paper: Aaron W. Thompson, Linda Stalker Prokopy, Kristin Floress and Denise C. ...
-
Rutgers is a mighty big place with plenty of exciting happenings in different parts of campus and in various departments and centers, so it ...
-
After posting over 300 of these photos, I do think that NJ stands out a little. While it has a surprisingly small number of Interstate inter...
-
During my visit to Louisiana I got to serve as a guest critic on a design jury at the Robert Reich School of Landscape Architecture . The s...
-
It turns out that in their rush to assemble those FEMA trailers, that they a) built them poorly and b) used toxic materials. A recent repor... -
The US Climate Change progam , led by the USGS, has released a report that says that climate change and sea level rise are happening faster ...
-
(NOTE: Summertime has already meant shorter posts and periods of silence. Expect much more of the same until late August) While the 1950s p...
-
Salt Lake City's Granary District says yes. Tim Halbur explains on PlaNetizen .
About the Author
- David Tulloch
- Director of SEBS General Honors Program and Professor of Landscape Architecture in Rutgers’ School of Environmental and Biological Sciences and Associate Director of the Grant F. Walton Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis. Dr. Tulloch can be reached at tulloch[at]crssa.rutgers.edu Research online at: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0692-9190 https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=lOLIQZ8AAAAJ&hl=en https://crssa.rutgers.edu/projects/geohealth/
Links of Interest
Profile Badges
Commenting
The blog currently allows open commenting on posts as a way of creating discussion and dialogue. Please keep comments clean, civil and relevant. Places and Spaces reserves the right to delete all comments, particularly those that are unverified, mean-spirited or undermining the pedagogic intent of the blog.
7 comments:
I found Frank's paper difficult, personally I do not work well with linking concepts to numbers to show a relationship. However the chapter from Monmonier was basic, straight forward, and was very useful for ecologist such as myseklf who are new to GIS and mapping concepts.
The 'one-size-fits-all' argument vs. 'scales relevant to answering specific question' side of the discussion by Frank is relevant to our work in inventory and analysis during our studio work. Sometimes, we approach the task with a uniform scale or a map in order to answer all questions. I don't feel as if it is as effective in answering the questions. Many times the discussion becomes more about paper size and printer capabilities. That being said, figuring out the right scale based on the problem you are trying to solve is challenging. It is one we are dealing with right now--how do we scale a long narrow corridor in order to make several different design decisions which will ultimately represent our proposal visually? And, will choosing a scale that is too coarse, move our design in a direction that overlooks details which will ultimately be important to the design?
But figuring out the "right scale" should include a discussion of how you think it will impact the work. COGNITIVE - Are you worried about the scale of the outputs being such that they mislead or misdirect you?
QUALITY - Is the scale at which the data was developed appropriate to your work?
Both can mislead you.
Great article!
I like this idea that Frank presents of giving up the "general purpose" map. After all, what is a general purpose map? If you surveyed people on the street, my guess would be that you would receive responses like "Google Maps" or "the AAA map in my glove compartment from 1998". But these maps are not general purpose - they have been produced with intent and authorship.
For Google Maps, I would assume the most typical usage to be for driving directions. A massive layer of information within Google Maps is dedicated to that purpose. But the same system can give you the same directions for walking or public transportation. So are we now talking about one map, or three maps? Is any map in Google Maps a general purpose map? I would say no, because the the layers of information, and the ability to filter them, give even the most basic user the cartographic power to include or exclude something from a map or, in other words, to suit each map to his or hew own specific purpose - quite not "general" in any way.
As for the AAA map in my glove compartment from 1998, well, it wasn't general either. It was composed for a certain type of navigation. I remember this type of map as regional in nature, with an emphasis on the more heavily trafficked roadways and highways. I could not, for instance, use one of thee maps to find a McDonald's in Somerset County. I could, however, verify that Route 22 West would take me to Easton, PA. So what do you consider general information? Burger joints? County jurisdictions? State highways? Your answer may be yes to all three, but that doesn't mean it would make sense to have them all on the same "general purpose" map.
Monmonier's "Elements of the Map" was helpful in reinforcing the reading on projections from the main text. I also appreciated the clear and simple descriptions of size, shape, graytone, texture, etc. on p. 20. Simple to understand; but, probably much more difficult to implement consistently in maps.
--also, I like the title of Ch.3- looking forward to reading it.
I know that this comment isn't related to the assigned readings, but I wanted to share. Apologies if this is already on the blog. But I thought that this article in Metropolis Magazine presents an interesting use of GIS mapping.
http://www.metropolismag.com/story/20120125/game-changes-laura-kurgan-sarah-williams
Post a Comment